17
VISAPosted by Nathan 🇺🇸 USA · 1 month ago
Can I keep my remote job from home while on a D-4?
i work for a company back home, paid into my home bank account, nothing to do with korea.
is that considered working in korea? nobody gives a straight answer on this
is that considered working in korea? nobody gives a straight answer on this
10 comments
OFFICIAL ANSWER
KyaALLO TEAM
Founder & Head Consultant · Seoul
You get vague answers because the situation is genuinely a grey area in Korean law, and anyone giving you a confident yes or no is overstating what is settled. Here is the honest position.
What is clear:
1. The D-4 permits study. Any work performed in Korea requires the part-time work permit, and that permit covers employment with a Korean employer.
2. Immigration's framework was written around physical employment in Korea. Remote work for a foreign employer, paid abroad into a foreign account, with no Korean client, no Korean income and no Korean employer, is not what that framework was built to address.
3. There is no explicit prohibition on continuing pre-existing remote employment for a foreign company, and there is also no explicit permission. Enforcement against students in this position is not something we see in practice, but "rarely enforced" is not the same as "permitted".
What increases risk:
- Any Korean client or Korean-sourced income. This moves you clearly into territory that requires authorisation.
- Being paid into a Korean account for work.
- Spending long enough in Korea to trigger tax residency — generally 183 days in a tax year — at which point your worldwide income may become reportable in Korea. This is a tax question separate from the visa question and it catches people.
- Anything that looks like running a business from Korea.
- Letting the work affect your attendance. This is the thing that actually gets noticed, because attendance is what immigration checks.
What we would say to a student in your position: the arrangement you describe — foreign employer, foreign payment, pre-existing job, no Korean connection — is the lowest-risk version of this and is very common among students. Keep it that way, keep your attendance above 90 percent, and do not take Korean clients.
And because this is genuinely unsettled: if the income is significant or you plan to stay past a year, this is worth a paid consultation with a Korean immigration lawyer or a licensed administrative scrivener (행정사). That is a small cost against the size of the thing you would be risking, and it is the only way to get an answer you can rely on rather than a forum consensus.
What is clear:
1. The D-4 permits study. Any work performed in Korea requires the part-time work permit, and that permit covers employment with a Korean employer.
2. Immigration's framework was written around physical employment in Korea. Remote work for a foreign employer, paid abroad into a foreign account, with no Korean client, no Korean income and no Korean employer, is not what that framework was built to address.
3. There is no explicit prohibition on continuing pre-existing remote employment for a foreign company, and there is also no explicit permission. Enforcement against students in this position is not something we see in practice, but "rarely enforced" is not the same as "permitted".
What increases risk:
- Any Korean client or Korean-sourced income. This moves you clearly into territory that requires authorisation.
- Being paid into a Korean account for work.
- Spending long enough in Korea to trigger tax residency — generally 183 days in a tax year — at which point your worldwide income may become reportable in Korea. This is a tax question separate from the visa question and it catches people.
- Anything that looks like running a business from Korea.
- Letting the work affect your attendance. This is the thing that actually gets noticed, because attendance is what immigration checks.
What we would say to a student in your position: the arrangement you describe — foreign employer, foreign payment, pre-existing job, no Korean connection — is the lowest-risk version of this and is very common among students. Keep it that way, keep your attendance above 90 percent, and do not take Korean clients.
And because this is genuinely unsettled: if the income is significant or you plan to stay past a year, this is worth a paid consultation with a Korean immigration lawyer or a licensed administrative scrivener (행정사). That is a small cost against the size of the thing you would be risking, and it is the only way to get an answer you can rely on rather than a forum consensus.
Was this helpful?Updated 1 month ago
10 comments
Sign in to join the conversation.
You can still post anonymously after signing in.Anonymous-9043 · 1 month ago
finally an answer that admits it's a grey area instead of confidently saying yes or no. every other thread on this is people asserting opposite things
26
Practical-Pigeon-1615 🇺🇸 USA · 1 month ago
yeah this is the first straight answer i've found on it
9
Anonymous-2958 · 1 month ago
the honest answer is "unsettled, low enforcement, don't add korean clients" and nobody wants to say that
7
Wandering-Jury-5759 🇩🇪 Germany · 1 month ago
the 183 day tax residency thing is the part people miss entirely. it's a separate question from the visa and it can genuinely bite you
19
Anonymous-0133 · 1 month ago
yep. two different authorities, two different rulebooks. people only think about immigration
8
Wandering-Jury-5759 🇩🇪 Germany · 1 month ago
i paid for one hour with a korean accountant and it was the best money i spent that year
6
Salty-Cabbage-4558 🇨🇦 Canada · 1 month ago
kept my remote job the whole year, foreign employer, foreign account. never an issue. but i also had 97% attendance and no korean clients at all
14
Anonymous-4610 · 1 month ago
the moment you take a korean client you're in a completely different situation. that's the line that actually matters
11
Anonymous-7678 · 1 month ago
and getting paid into a korean account for work. don't do that
5
Quiet-Otter-5648 🇰🇷 Korea · 1 month ago
a 행정사 consultation is like 50-100k won for an hour. if your income is meaningful, pay it. forum consensus is not a legal opinion
8
Related questions
VISACan I work part-time in Korea on a D-4 student visa?VISACan I switch from tourist entry to a D-4 visa inside Korea?VISACan you register your ARC address at a goshiwon?1-second sign in
No password — Google or a 6-digit email code.
Ask a question
Post with your name or anonymously
1-second sign in
No password — Google or a 6-digit email code.
Continue with GoogleContinue with EmailYou can still post anonymously after signing in.